RIL
Descriptions, notes, and TILs marked with this icon are AI-generated. Pencil icon means my own words.
This is real, ongoing curation — everything here is something I've actually read, listened to, or watched and saved, not sample data. Set up your own instance.
TIL

Self-help fails because people pick advice that flatters their existing strengths

via The good advice you least want (with Cate Hall)

Read aloud

AI-generated writing.

Cate Hall argues most self-help underperforms not because the advice is bad but because of adverse selection in what people choose to read: everyone has a “default shape” — a way of solving problems that comes naturally — and gravitates toward advice that reinforces that shape rather than the counterintuitive advice that would actually stretch it. A relentlessly hard-working problem-solver picks up more books about grinding harder; a more intuitive, emotionally-led person picks up books about trusting their gut. Both would benefit most from the opposite.

She uses the Enneagram less as a mystical typing system and more as a diagnostic shortcut for spotting that default shape and the core fear underneath it, since naming the fear that generates both a person’s strengths and their liabilities makes it easier to notice which “obvious” constraints are really just habits of avoidance rather than facts about the world.

The throughline to personal agency is what Hall calls degrees of freedom: many limits people treat as fixed are untested social scripts, and the fastest way to find them is deliberately taking on low-stakes rejection (asking for things that feel presumptuous) to recalibrate how dangerous asking actually is. In practice, high-agency people aren’t reckless — they’re just more willing to test whether a constraint is real before accepting it.

Takeaways:

  1. Adverse selection explains most self-help failure. People pick advice that flatters their default shape, not the counterintuitive advice that would actually change them.
  2. “Default shape” is the recurring pattern, not the circumstance. The same anxiety/optimism baseline reasserts itself across very different life situations — good or bad.
  3. The Enneagram is a diagnostic shortcut, not a metaphysical claim. Its value is naming the core fear that generates both a person’s strengths and their liabilities.
  4. “Degrees of freedom” — most constraints are untested scripts. Low-stakes rejection practice recalibrates how dangerous asking actually feels versus how dangerous it actually is.